| allonymist ( @ 2008-01-29 13:26:00 |
| Current mood: | |
| Current music: | Squeeze—The Singles |
| Entry tags: | books |
Recently Read
I'm going to try to write about every book I read. Let's see how long this lasts.
The Gods of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs
So, John Carter goes back to Mars. It's never really clear why he keeps getting warped back there. The first time (in A Princess of Mars), it was a magic Indian cave. This time, he just warps to Mars by warning to go badly enough. As usual, he's beset by an endless series of insanely dangerous threats (plant men, carnivorous white apes, etc). By authorial fiat, he arrives just in time to save his big four-armed green buddy, the deadly Tars Tarkas from a bunch of the aforementioned plant men. The first third of the book has a one-damn-thing-after-another quality, as the protagonists escape an ever-escalating set of frying pans only to fall into an increasingly weird set of fires. With time, though, a theme begins to emerge.
The Griffin and Sabine Trilogy by Nick Bantock
The theme seems to be religion and exploitation. Throughout the book, a succession of Martian societies realize that their long-cherished beliefs of the afterlife are in fact cruel hoaxes perpetrated on them by other societies, by self-serving rulers, or tragic misunderstandings. You'd think that some of them would catch on, and not just go around saying, "How foolish the outsiders are to believe that the Mysterious River Iss leads to paradise, rather than carnivorous plant-men, dreaded white apes, and a lifetime of enslavement! How lucky we are to know that true paradise is available at the end of the Long Ominous Tunnel From Which Nobody Returns!"
The racial obsessions are very 1913 (in that they assume that race is quite important), but not mean-spirited. Mars is peopled by different species and races, and it's assumed that each race will have its own "character" and its own monoculture, and that some kind of competition will exist. Burroughs doesn't seem to buy into the "purity" doctrines of contemporary racists, though: the Red Martians are portrayed as being admirable because they descend from all the other races, not because of any innate superiority. Members of all martian races are portrayed as being heroic and villainous by turns, though admittedly only John Carter is portrayed as having enough brains to know a crock of bs when he sees it. It's stupid, but not quite as ugly as some of the junk Burroughs did in Tarzan.
The best reason to read Burroughs is still IMO the prose style. For example, suppose you've just found out that the object of a recent crush is in an exclusive relationship with someone else. There's taking it gracefully, there's taking it badly, and then there's this:"Dog," she hissed. "Dog of a blasphemer! [1] Think you that Phaidor, daughter of Matai Shang, supplicates? She commands. What to her is our puny outer world passion for the vile creature you chose in your other life?"They sure don't write 'em like that any more.
"Phaidor has glorified you with her love, and you have spurned her. Ten thousand unthinkably atrocious deaths could not atone for the affront that you have put upon me. The thing that you call Dejah Thoris will die the most horrible of them all. You have sealed the warning for her doom."
"And you! You shall be the meanest slave in the service of the goddess you have attempted to humiliate. Tortures and ignominies shall be heaped upon you until you grovel at my feet asking the boon of death."
"In my gracious generosity I shall at length grant your prayer, and from the high balcony of the Golden Cliffs I shall watch the great white apes tear you asunder."
[1] On reflection, I can't recall that there are actually any dogs on Mars at all. Perhaps this is meant to be a translator's liberty, and she really called him a "small-contemptible-six-legged-scavenging-pack-animal of a blasphemer."
This is a series of three books about a romance between two artists who become aware of each other through weird supernatural means. The novelty here is mainly the format: the pages hold a series of postcards, intermixed with envelopes holding one-page letters you can remove from the books and read.Evil for Evil by K.J. Parker
I didn't really get into these books. I think that the characters are supposed to be deep and soulful by authorial fiat, but I can't really see deep and soulful people conducting the long-distance romance of their life over so many postcards and one-page letters. Also, the final resolution to the series didn't seem to answer many of the mysteries that had come up over the course of the books, but seemed a little arbitrary.
In the end, I couldn't help feeling I'd missed something, like if I read the whole series again I might find out unequivocally which of the events in the letters really happened, or that all the characters were secretly telepathic goldfish from pluto, or something like that. Still, the artwork and overall design were great.
This is the second book of Parker's Engineer Trilogy. In the first book, we met a bunch of characters of varying degrees of likeability, all of whom were swept unawares into the complex machiavellian plans of a mild-mannered exiled engineer of uncertain motive. Now, the plans get more complex, and we start to see the overall outline of what the fellow has in mind, and the hero/villain status of many of the characters gets way more ambiguous.
The setting is zero-magic, which makes sense: the plot relies on one city having maintained an industrialization monopoly for generations. I rather liked how this volume started to resolve some of the flaws of the first volume, which IMO relied maybe a bit too much on nobody being quite as smart or the protagonist or catching on that the protagonist wasn't necessarily acting in their best interest in time. Finally, things start to go almost-wrong, somewhat-wrong, or badly-right for the protagonist, and some people start to be wise as to what he's really up to. (Assuming that is what he's really up to.)
So far, the moral of the story seems to be that elaborate machiavellian government-toppling plots might be fun to read about, but they really require you to get lucky if you want them to work, and you wouldn't want to be on the same continent as one anyway what with all the collateral damage.
I'm not sure how I feel about the overall plotting: there aren't really many "idiot plot" elements (i.e., places where the plot would fall apart if any character behaved sensibly), but there are maybe a few too many places where characters are too good at predicting how other characters will react to certain things. People just aren't that predictable: no matter how much you think Duke X is in love with his childhood sweetheart Y, you can't make an empire-toppling plan that absolutely requires that X will choose loyalty to Y over everything else he holds dear, especially when all available evidence says that X is really really good at self-sacrifice.
Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell
Vowell recounts her visits to places associated with the Lincoln, McKinley, and Garfield assassinations and assassins. The prose style is charming, the book full of fun assassin facts, and the narrative really captures the feeling of having a strange hobby that your friends and family don't share.
As a side note, my earlier pop-culture sources on the Garfield assassination were sadly lacking, it seems. I'd realized that Giteau was a bit deluded concerning his chances of getting to be Ambassador to France, but I didn't realize that he had looked for acceptance in the Oneida free-love commune, but couldn't get a date. Nor did I know that he fancied himself a visionary genius, or that claimed at his trial to be speaking for God, to have a great mission of reform for the US, and to be a great hero for the ages. Note to self: stop tweaking delusional narcissists; they aren't all harmless. Note to self #2: See Sondheim's Assassins some time.
Swordspoint by Ellen Kushner
I'd read the sequel to this book, and got halfway into it before I realized that it was a sequel. Usually when this happens, I don't enjoy volume one very much, since I've inadvertently spoiled myself completely. This time, though, the characters and events were disconnected enough that I didn't figure out who some of the recurring characters were until the novel was nearly over.
Again, we're in a zero-magic world, this time in the capital mercantile city, run as an oligarchy by a bunch of noble families who did away with the old king ages ago, and spend all their time hiring swordsmen to amuse themselves and to intimidate their rivals for political advantage, the good of the city, and/or personal benefit. The main character is a paid duelist who's great as a duelist but not too good at much else besides. He and his lover have exciting adventures, sad adventures, and find themselves as pawns in the overall political situation.
Neither the heros nor the villains display terribly good judgment, but the character development and writing are so well defined that I felt like people were doing iffy things because that's who they are, not because the plot needs them to do it. I also like Kushner's fake-outs, where she sets up plot points that wind up getting superseded by other, more pressing plot developments. Still, not for everyone.
Why have I not read any LeCarré before? It's obvious why this is classic. I'd say more, but it's really hard to explain what I like about it without massive spoilers. I think I figured out the plot about two chapters before the characters did, which was optimal: too late and I'd feel dumb; too early and I'd feel that the characters were being monumentally stupid.
Coming soon: a music post!